ICC prosecutors: US forces may have committed war crimes
THE HAGUE, Netherlands U.S. troops and CIA agents could face investigation and possible charges by the International Criminal Court after its chief prosecutor said in a report that they may have committed war crimes by torturing detainees in Afghanistan. Members of U.S. armed forces appear to have subjected at least 61 detained persons to torture, cruel treatment, outrages upon personal dignity on the territory of Afghanistan between 1 May 2003 and 31 December 2014, according to the report issued Nov. 14 by Prosecutor Fatou Bensoudas office. CIA operatives also may have subjected at least 27 detainees in Afghanistan, Poland, Romania and Lithuania to torture, cruel treatment, outrages upon personal dignity and/or rape between December 2002 and March 2008.
The report said that Taliban and Afghan government forces also may have used torture and committed other atrocities in that countrys long and bitter conflict. According to the report, the Taliban and its affiliates killed thousands of people and are suspected of committing war crimes including murder, recruiting and conscripting child soldiers, and attacking civilians and humanitarian workers.
Prosecutors said they will decide imminently whether to seek authorization to open a full-scale investigation in Afghani-stan that could lead to war crimes charges.
Param-Preet Singh, associate international justice director at Human Rights Watch, stated, The ICC prosecutors report highlights some of the worst abuses committed by government forces and the Taliban in Afghanistan, where impunity remains the norm. The link to possible war crimes by the Central Intelligence Agency and the U.S. military shows that the ICC is prepared to investigate cases involving those who may otherwise seem beyond the reach of justice.
State Department spokeswoman Elizabeth Trudeau said the U.S. doesnt believe an ICC investigation is warranted or appropriate. She added, The United States is deeply committed to complying with the law of war, and we have a robust national system of investigation and accountability that more than meets international standards.
The report noted that U.S. authorities have conducted dozens of investigations and court-martial cases and says ICC prosecutors are seeking further clarifications on their scope before deciding whether any American cases would be admissible at the ICC.
Established in 2002, the International Criminal Court is the worlds first permanent court set up to prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. It is a court of last resort that takes on cases only when other countries are unable or unwilling to prosecute. More than 120 countries around the world are members, but the U.S., Russia and China have not signed up.
Former-President Bill Clinton signed the Rome Statute that established the court on Dec. 31, 2000, but President George W. Bush renounced the signature, citing fears that Americans would be unfairly prosecuted for political reasons.
Even though the U.S. is not a member of the court, Americans could still face prosecution at its headquarters in The Hague if they commit crimes within its jurisdiction in a country that is a member, such as Afghanistan, and are not prosecuted at home. ICC prosecutors say investigations also are underway in Poland, Romania and Lithuania all signatories to the Rome Statute into possible crimes at CIA detention facilities in those countries.
Referring to the alleged U.S. war crimes, the report said they appear to have been committed as part of approved interrogation techniques in an attempt to extract actionable intelligence from detainees. The report adds that, The information available suggests that victims were deliberately subjected to physical and psychological violence, and that crimes were allegedly committed with particular cruelty and in a manner that debased the basic human dignity of the victims.
After the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, the administration of Presi-dent George W. Bush allowed the use of waterboarding, which simulates drowning, and other so-called enhanced interrogation techniques against suspected terrorists. President Barack Obama banned such practices after taking office in 2009.
During the presidential campaign, Republican nominee Donald Trump suggested that as president he would push to change laws that prohibit waterboarding and other harsh interrogation techniques, arguing that banning them puts the U.S. at a strategic disadvantage against Islamic State militants.
edited from an artice
by Mike Corder, Associated Press, November 15, 2016
PeaceMeal, Nov/December 2016
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)